It seems there are a lot of strong opinions on what makes an imageboard good or bad.
What comprises a "perfect" imageboard to you?
Admin that bans the worst offending incels.
Controversy fine, schizo retards bad.
Early 4chan (2003-2005).
A imageboard that people can say what they want as long is not any crime like CP or doxxing
SMALL userbase(this is absolutely a must). Large userbases have a tendency to be deplorável.
Admin that band cringe of every flavor from e-girl to incel, commie to ancap, nigger to white nationalist. A good imageboard is only normalfags.
>A good imageboard is only normalfags.
you are correct.
wizards and neets don't produce anything and are not good enough for any interesting stuff
>wizards and neets don't produce anything
Agreed that the majority do not produce, but I would include all peoples...
Original 4chan was much geekier, but most of those people would qualify as more normalfag than today’s people.
Social media is inherently bad, so this cannot exist.
doxxing shouldn't be a crime to be quite honest, it's basically just finding things about someone online. if you keep your shit private, then it's not hard to not get doxxed,
What if they still find you? You do realize there's nothing stopping you from getting your shit pushed in. You just to tick off the wrong people.
Avoiding normie social media improves your privacy a big timer, but it is not perfect, especially for non-NEETs, if you are in a government database that has your photo and a disgruntled client posts your info on an imageboard your pretty much fucked.
All it took was to remember a former quack's name, a quick internet search and I find her address and phone number and have her bombarded with pizza deliveries and prank calls.
Avenue d'Argenteuil 65
+32 2 434 95 55
This information is provided as an example, please try to be civil if you are thinking of (ab)using it.
I don't endorse or condone anything beyond immature prank calls such as this: